User Reviews for Gresham Hotel, London | MyTravelGuide.com


My Travel Guide home

User Reviews for Gresham Hotel

Research 8 user reviews for Gresham Hotel.

« Go back to Gresham Hotel
36 Bloomsbury Street, Bloomsbury, London, United Kingdom

Research User Reviews for Gresham Hotel (1-8 of 8)

Average User Rating: 5.5
User Rating Score:5.5
Cleanliness:[4.5] • Staff:[7.5] •
Based on 22 user ratings
Add Your Own Rating

May 20, 2005 by Hotel Guest
Overall Rating: 10 User Rating Score: 10
Cleanliness:[8] • Staff:[10] •

  • Close to West End and Covent Garden.
  • Nothing!

“The website gave me all the information that was needed.”

Was this review helpful to you? → YES / NO

Feb 22, 2005 by Angela from Darlington, United Kingdom
Overall Rating: 5 User Rating Score: 5
Cleanliness:[4] • Staff:[8] •

  • Handy for the centre. The room was warm.
  • The breakfast was appalling! There was no bacon and the scrambled eggs were disgusting.

“It was relatively cheap and well located. I wouldn't book again unless the food was sorted out. Kettles in the rooms would also be useful.”

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you? → YES / NO

Feb 19, 2005 by Anonymous
Overall Rating: 5 User Rating Score: 5
Cleanliness:[2] • Staff:[8] •

  • Ideal location for the west end
  • Hotel smelled damp , room dark and old,second bed not comfortable and unstable all slept in one bed

“The location of the hotel was ideal for our visit. The staff are lovely kind and friendly to the children. From the out side the hotel looks ok. The inside lets it down it smells of damp and looks very old and run down. I just wanted a cheap nights acommadation so this was the best i could get for the price. I do think it is still expensive for what it is.”

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you? → YES / NO

Dec 15, 2004 by Anonymous
Overall Rating: 5 User Rating Score: 5
Cleanliness:[2] • Staff:[10] •

  • Location. Rooms were warm enough.
  • Coffee machines broken, floors, bathrooms bedrooms dirty. single beds were no more than foam mattresses, with stained covers. paint needed everywhere. No useful lounge offered.

“The staff where friendly and courteous, and very helpful, and should have a hotel worthy of them. Unfortunately, this hotel needs some serious upgrades to make it worth the expense, even in Central London. We stayed in the Bloomsbury Thistle not far away, for the same price, and felt much more comfortable, and it was nicer and cleaner.”

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you? → YES / NO

Sep 28, 2004 by Anonymous
Overall Rating: 6 User Rating Score: 6
Cleanliness:[4] • Staff:[8] •

  • The location,its proximity to London sites of interest, close to Oxford Street for shopping.
  • Rather basic, no tea/coffee making facilities, and no hairdryer in room.

“Although a very basic room, the beds where clean and comfortable, also a very quiet hotel at night. TV too high to watch in comfort, and no tea/coffee making facilities. Although hairdryer available at reception would have been nice to have in room. Breakfast was an experience - but having said that, it was not expensive, we got what we paid for - it was clean, tidy, and the staff were friendly and helpful.”

Was this review helpful to you? → YES / NO

Sep 18, 2004 by Anonymous
Overall Rating: 5 User Rating Score: 5
Cleanliness:[6] • Staff:[6] •

  • great location to tube and west end nice white clean sheets sink in room
  • no bacon or eggs for breakfast needs a lick of paint in room, quite shabby very stained carpet and curtains lamp broken very hot and nosiy from outside

“Knew it was basic and clean but aircon is a must even at the end of summer.”

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you? → YES / NO

Aug 10, 2004 by Claire from Toronto, Canada
Overall Rating: 8 User Rating Score: 8
Cleanliness:[8] • Staff:[8] •

  • - room was excellent value for money and good size - clean - friendly staff
  • - friend's room smelled of cigarettes - was given scrambled instead of poached egg for breakfast and told it was poached

“I was very impressed with the room I got, but as mentioned, my friend's was smaller and smelled badly of stale cigarettes. As we both paid the same, I'd worry in future that rooms are hit or miss. However for the location, you can't beat the price. I would definately come back, and will recommend it to friends visiting London.”

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you? → YES / NO

Aug 10, 2004 by Anonymous
Overall Rating: 6 User Rating Score: 6
Cleanliness:[6] • Staff:[8] •

  • The room was clean and the service good. The hotel was situated in a good location. Easy to find.
  • The room was very small and the bathroom even smaller. The organisation at breakfast wasn't very clear.

“The hotel was ok, i think the price and the location compensated for the bad points. I found the en suite bedroom very small and couldn't imagine staying there any longer than 2 nights. I think the breakfast staff could've been more forthcoming in welcoming you and explaining what you did at breakfast. I know i could've asked, but as a lone traveller it would've been nice for someone to have approached me.”

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you? → YES / NO

Compare Hotel Prices for Gresham Hotel

Step 1
Enter your travel details:

graphical calendar interface

graphical calendar interface


Step 2
Choose a travel site:
Expedia.com
Kayak.com
BookingBuddy.com
Travelocity
Orbitz.com
See more great deals for Gresham Hotel »
Hotel Representatives:

Copyright © 2009 MyTravelGuide.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
MYTravelGuide is a service mark of priceline.com Incorporated

About Us •  Privacy policy •  Terms and Conditions •  Help  •  Partner Links  •  Free E-mail Alert

Site Map •  Hotels by City •  City Travel Guides •  Attractions •  Restaurants •  Cheap Hotels •  Hotels in Asia •  Pet Friendly Hotels

MyTravelGuide.com is not a booking agent and does not charge any service fees to users of our site.
MyTravelGuide.com is not responsible for content on external web sites.