User Reviews for Holiday Inn San Diego-National City

Research User Reviews for Holiday Inn San Diego-National City (41-49 of 49)

• Add Your Own Review »

Aug 19, 2006 by Kevin from Lilburn, GA
Overall Rating: 7
Cleanliness:[5] • Staff:[9] • Location:[6]

• Staff was very helpful and nice.
• The hotel's surroundings were a little sketchy.

“Good place to stay for a decent price.”

Aug 17, 2006 by Mary from Port Hueneme, CA
Overall Rating: 10
Cleanliness:[10] • Staff:[10] • Location:[8]

• Very nice staff.
• Dining/bar limited hours.

“Very nice accommodations, in a possibly less than optimal part of town. Good price and very nice staff.”

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.

Aug 15, 2006 by Patricia from Paradise, CA
Overall Rating: 3
Cleanliness:[2] • Staff:[7] • Location:[2]

• The front desk staff was wonderful and accommodating. The dining staff was friendly and apologetic.
• We had 2 breakfasts in the dining room. The coffee and food were terrible.

“This is a l960's hotel with little updates in an area that is declining rapidly. I did not feel safe. This 10 story hotel is not for someone with vertigo. All the rooms are reached by a central elevator to an H shaped 6 ft. wide exterior balcony with a 3 ft. open metal railings. It is very windy and exposed. Even hugging the walls does not help. Get a room close to the elevators. I had egg shells in my scrambled eggs and some black and rotten potatoes in the home fries. The coffee was terrible. The toast two mornings in a row ranged from uncooked to burnt. The staff cannot compensate for the declining building and filth down to the empty beer cans floating in the pool. I would not recommend this hotel.”

Aug 8, 2006 by Nicole from Clovis, CA
Overall Rating: 2
Cleanliness:[4] • Staff:[4] • Location:[3]

• Food was ok.
• Not maintained well and didn't feel safe.

“The shower head leaked, the air conditioner leaked, The room didn't feel clean. I had to go to the sixth floor to find ice. I had an incident and needed poison controls number. The front desk couldn't get it and for warded me to the nearest hospital which I got charged for the call from the hotel. It was not in a very good part of town. It took forever to check me out.”

Aug 7, 2006 by Anthony from West Jordan, UT
Overall Rating: 1
Cleanliness:[1] • Location:[1]

• Nothing.
• No communication would not recommend.

“The rooms were filthy, the housekeeping needs to do a better job 1st room was filthy, 2nd room had a wet carpet and smelled plus a broken lamp, 3rd had a pubic hair on towel. The final was just ok.”

Jul 6, 2006 by Latifu from Sacramento, CA
Overall Rating: 9
Cleanliness:[9] • Staff:[9] • Location:[9]

• Quiet.
• the thermostat was not adjustable and it took the room a long time to cool off

“Nice and clean older hotel needing new carpet and upholstery. Friendly staff and guests. Provided a welcome package of much needed water and snacks. I felt very comfortable there and would definitely return.”

Jul 6, 2006 by Tabitha from Mesa, AZ
Overall Rating: 5
Cleanliness:[6] • Staff:[4] • Location:[4]

• Right off the freeway.
• Bad part of town.

“The ac in this hotel was so loud. To carry a conversation you had to turn it off, otherwise shout over it. The night we arrived they weren't sure if there was a room for us.”

May 31, 2006 by Frank from Ontario, CA
Overall Rating: 8
Cleanliness:[8] • Staff:[10] • Location:[8]

• Very close to downtown and beaches and just about everything else.
• Had some pretty loud A/C fans blowing in front of the hotel.

“The hotel was better than I expected for the price, location was very good, the freeway entrances where right in front of the hotel, everything in the room worked and it was clean, the beds where comfortable and overall acceptable.”

Mar 29, 2006 by Patricia from Newbury Park, CA
Overall Rating: 7
Cleanliness:[10] • Staff:[7] • Location:[7]

• They did not save my reservation because I got in very late. Even when I called they assured me they would have a room for me. 3 people for king bed.

“The hotel was ok, however I called and told them I would be in very late. Instead of two doubles for 3 people we were given a choice of a king smoking room or a king non smoking. Also not happy because I was charged $16 more a night than the hotel rate!”