|
||||||
|
| ||||||
Waverley House Hotel
130 - 134 Southhampton Row, Bloomsbury,
London, United Kingdom
|
||||||
|
|
|
Average User Rating: 7.0 Cleanliness:[7.5] • Staff:[7.5] • Based on 41 user ratings |
Apr 15, 2005 by
Hotel Guest
Overall Rating: 6
Cleanliness:[8] •
Staff:[8] •
“For the price this seemed a fair London hotel. Situated half way between St Pancras & Covent Garden (both easy walking) it was an ideal location. Staff generally friendly and helpful..particularly Nellie”
Mar 24, 2005 by
Darren from Bishops Stortford, United Kingdom
Overall Rating: 8
Cleanliness:[8] •
Staff:[8] •
“Very good for the price. Eat as much as you like breakfast is included. Perfect for us - we were just looking for somewhere to stay overnight near oxford street. It was a very comfortable stay. No hassles. Would recommend. Mon the Park!”
Mar 1, 2005 by
Anonymous
Overall Rating: 7
Cleanliness:[8] •
Staff:[8] •
“Breakfast was good, staff were nice, room was adeguate...the toilet seat was broken and never was replaced.... however, the room was larger than we expected. We were happy with our stay overall.”
Feb 9, 2005 by
Anonymous
Overall Rating: 7
Cleanliness:[8] •
Staff:[6] •
“the room was smaller than it looked on the info but was clean, comfortable and met my needs. Breakfast was good and we enjoyed our stay.”
Dec 18, 2004 by
Anonymous
Overall Rating: 9
Cleanliness:[10] •
Staff:[10] •
“Great value for money. Friendly staff.”
Dec 17, 2004 by
Anonymous
Overall Rating: 10
Cleanliness:[10] •
Staff:[10] •
“I arrived early and the room was ready. Check in was quick and friendly (not too much information) Simple check in process Room was clean, heating was easily controlled.
Breakfast was good.
Checkout was quick and simple.
Overall price was very competitive.”
Dec 16, 2004 by
Anonymous
Overall Rating: 7
Cleanliness:[8] •
Staff:[10] •
“Overall it served the purpose, but did not get a good night's sleep due to qaulity of bed.
Would recommend hotel but caution others about the ned toupdate bed facilities.”
Dec 11, 2004 by
SINE from Bromsgrove, United Kingdom
Overall Rating: 6
Cleanliness:[4] •
Staff:[8] •
“Staff helpful, friendly and efficient. A great asset!”
Dec 9, 2004 by
Anonymous
Overall Rating: 7
Cleanliness:[8] •
Staff:[8] •
“Adequate for the price. Staff seemed friendly and efficient. No real complaints -- apart from the fire alarm at 3 a.m.!”
Dec 2, 2004 by
Richard from Cambridge, United Kingdom
Overall Rating: 7
Cleanliness:[6] •
Staff:[8] •
“We had a good time and the room was comfortable but let down by the state of the bathroom and the smell of smoke (we're non smokers). On reflection it would have been good idea to specify non smoking but I don't remember having the option. I really do think the hotel is getting a little bit shabby and needs refurbishing. This didn't really detract from our experience. I guess this is to be expected of a '100 per night hotel in London. Or is it? Having said that the staff were courteous and helpful and once we got used to the minor flaws, we enjoyed our weekend.”
Nov 25, 2004 by
Anonymous
Overall Rating: 9
Cleanliness:[10] •
Staff:[8] •
“our stay was very good over all”
Nov 18, 2004 by
Robert from CHESTERFIELD, United Kingdom
Overall Rating: 9
Cleanliness:[10] •
Staff:[10] •
“very good overall, location superb, more than met expectations”
Nov 13, 2004 by
Anonymous
Overall Rating: 6
Cleanliness:[6] •
Staff:[6] •
“would liked to have known breakfast menu.room was ok but bathroom is in need of updating, it had no ventilation as window did not open.shower was hard to get to run at correct temperature.there are plenty of coffee shops and restaurants nearby,we also found it in a handy location for most places we wanted to visit, with easy access to underground.”
Nov 12, 2004 by
Anonymous
Overall Rating: 6
Cleanliness:[6] •
Staff:[4] •
“We felt the hotel best fitted the adequate category, but was very convenient and the room contained all we required. Upgrading would enhance the general decor. The food was good and overall an overnight stay was good value.”
Nov 5, 2004 by
Anonymous
Overall Rating: 5
Cleanliness:[2] •
Staff:[8] •
“I was not happy with the soundproofing, or lack of it. There was a smell of food in the reception area and othe non-dining areas,which was not pleasant.The location of the bars, I thought lacked thought,i.e through a dining area or downstairs signed Toilets!”
Nov 1, 2004 by
Richard from Leeds, United Kingdom
Overall Rating: 8
Cleanliness:[8] •
Staff:[8] •
“A fairly basic hotel, but very clean and friendly, and provided all i needed for a brief stay.”
Oct 31, 2004 by
Anonymous
Overall Rating: 8
Cleanliness:[8] •
Staff:[8] •
“Good hotel with excellent catering facilities.”
Oct 31, 2004 by
Anonymous
Overall Rating: 7
Cleanliness:[8] •
Staff:[8] •
“Reasonable value for money for the price I paid. Would not have been good value if I had paid the full rate.
Bedroom was Ok but a bit small.”
Oct 4, 2004 by
Anonymous
Overall Rating: 4
Cleanliness:[2] •
Staff:[6] •
“A colleague stayed in an hotel not far away for less expense with better facilities.
With better attention to detail Waverley House could make a better impression.”
Sep 23, 2004 by
Andrew from Laxey, United Kingdom
Overall Rating: 9
Cleanliness:[10] •
Staff:[10] •
“The hotel is well positioned for the amenities of London. The room was very clean and well stocked with toiletries and even had a coffee machine with proper ground coffee! The staff were all friendly and well trained. I was also impressed with the quality of the breakfast buffet especially when considering how reasonably priced the room was. Will definitely use again.”
Copyright © 2009 MyTravelGuide.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
MYTravelGuide is a service mark of priceline.com Incorporated
About Us • Privacy policy • Terms and Conditions • Help • Partner Links • Free E-mail Alert
Site Map • Hotels by City • City Travel Guides • Attractions • Restaurants • Cheap Hotels • Hotels in Asia • Pet Friendly Hotels
MyTravelGuide.com is not a booking agent and does not charge any service fees to users of our site.
MyTravelGuide.com is not responsible for content on external web sites.