Econo Lodge Montpelier

Photos of Econo Lodge Montpelier, Montpelier

• Add your own photo of Econo Lodge Montpelier

User Reviews for Econo Lodge Montpelier, Montpelier

• Add Your Own Review »

Aug 28, 2009 by Virginia from NH
Overall Rating: 1
Cleanliness:[1] • Staff:[1] • Location:[5]

• Getting our money back and going somewhere else.

“This was disgusting. I had stayed there years ago and it wasn't bad. The place is totally torn apart doing remodeling, which they have been doing for 2 years now. There were men working outside at 10 p.m. in their pajama bottoms only. Toilet didn't have water in it to work, holes in the walls, and too smelly. Beds looked like they were there forever and stained carpet dirty, cement wet outside, metal rails and torn up carpet on stairwell to second level. Do not stay there, dirty.”

Mar 23, 2009 by Brad from Quincy, MA
Overall Rating: 1
Cleanliness:[1] • Staff:[1] • Location:[1]

• I liked leaving!
• Wet toilet paper clumps stuck to the ceiling.

“The room was disgusting. Smoke detector wires hanging from ceiling. Hair all over the bathroom and drain clogged with hair. Don't bother staying here!”

May 16, 2008 by Dennis from Salem, MA
Overall Rating: 1
Cleanliness:[1] • Staff:[3] • Location:[6]

• Nothing.
• Cold room with no temperature control, not well maintained.

“If your only consideration is price and you are willing to overlook the shortcomings then this might be sufficient. Otherwise look elsewhere.”

Oct 24, 2007 by M from Little Rock, AR
Overall Rating: 1
Cleanliness:[1] • Staff:[1] • Location:[4]

• It was relatively inexpensive.
• It was dirty and the hotel staff seemed confused.

“The capital inn in Montpellier was no place that I could or would recommend to others. The room seemed was shabby and in desperate need of renovation. The hotel staff seemed to be confused and possibly intoxicated when we checked in. However, I read other reviews of the hotel when I booked our room so I was not entirely surprised.”

Oct 9, 2007 by Vijay from Acton, MA
Overall Rating: 3
Cleanliness:[1] • Staff:[4] • Location:[7]

• Did not like the hotel.
• It is not a hotel. It is less than a motel, expensive for the amenities provided.

“Costly for the facilities.”

Sep 6, 2007 by Amartya S. from Dayton, NJ
Overall Rating: 1
Cleanliness:[1] • Staff:[5] • Location