Parkside Family Inn and Suites

Photos of Parkside Family Inn and Suites, Flagstaff

• Add your own photo of Parkside Family Inn and Suites

User Reviews for Parkside Family Inn and Suites, Flagstaff

• Add Your Own Review »

Aug 6, 2008 by Kirsten P. from Orangevale, AZ
Overall Rating: 7
Cleanliness:[7] • Staff:[4] • Location:[7]

• Updated and clean.
• Not much of a breakfast.

“Clean, updated room. The mattresses were not of high quality, and the springs could be felt.”

Jul 22, 2008 by Jack from Cave Creek, AZ
Overall Rating: 2
Cleanliness:[4] • Staff:[4] • Location:[1]

• Nothing.
• Train tracks in back of hotel. Room only measured about 8x8 with very small bathroom as well.

“Too old, too small. Too noisy. We could hear people in the next room talking at normal levels. No parking.”

Jul 21, 2008 by Judy from Mesa, AZ
Overall Rating: 9
Cleanliness:[9] • Staff:[8] • Location:[9]

• The room, although a bit cramped was well-laid out. It was clean and comfortable and within short walking distance of the NAU campus.
• The soda machine was sold out of all products. In the summertime, this is tragic! The complimentary shampoo in the bathroom had been used before.

“This quaint hotel on part of the old Route 66 contained just what we needed for our one-night stop while on our road trip. There were many restaurants as well as the NAU campus within walking distance. Lowell Observatory was only about a 5 minute drive away and had evening hours for stargazing. Williams was a 30 minute drive to the West and we caught the Grand Canyon Railway in the morning. All in all, I'd return again for a night or two.”

Sep 17, 2007 by Jennifer from Casa Grande, AZ
Overall Rating: 3
Cleanliness:[4] • Staff:[2] • Location:[5]

• Large bed.
• Very old and hotel staff was not very friendly.

“I will not ever stay there again.”

May 30, 2007 by Karen from Lyman, SC
Overall Rating: 8
Cleanliness:[9] • Staff:[9] • Location:[10]

• Great continental breakfast!!
• The room door had wet paint when we arrived.

“Clean, well-maintained room, convenient location. Courteous, helpful staff. Great continental breakfast. Very hard bed :(”

May 22, 2007 by Ron from St. Ouis, MO
Overall Rating: 6
Cleanliness:[7] • Staff:[7] • Location:[7]

• Located close to restaurants and stores.

“It's an ageing motel that needs to be more modern. Air condition was loud and a small window unit.”

Jan 27, 2007 by Lisa from Flagstaff, AZ
Overall Rating: 5
Cleanliness:[4] • Staff:[9] • Location:[3]

• Sincere attempt to provide decent service in a 1940's facility.
• Close to train tracks and many noisy trains.

“This is one of those small, u-shaped motels that lined rt. 66 in the 1940's and 50's. As such, it is an old facility with limited capacity for meaningful renovation. My room barely managed to contain a single bed and a tiny bathroom that an oversized guest could not have used. However, the front desk staff was polite and professional, and the place made an effort to serve a "deluxe hot breakfast" of scrambled eggs and white toast. The rooms were renovated tastefully, as best one could do within the limitations of the facility. Basically, I got what I expected - a simple room with 1950's nostalgia - for the price I wanted to pay - $25.the only complaint under the circumstances was the filthy louvered grate covering the full-length gas wall heater.”

Dec 4, 2006 by David from Riverside, CA
Overall Rating: 7
Cleanliness:[5] • Staff:[9] • Location:[8]

• Good service, good location, comfortable bed.
• Loud with no soundproofing between rooms.

“Good service, friendly and professional, and mostly what I expected for the very low price. However, the walls are very thin, people next door sound like they are in the same room.”

Nov 17, 2006 by Rodney from Torrance, CA
Overall Rating: 5
Cleanliness:[7] • Staff:[7] • Location:[5]

• The cost effectiveness.
• Rooms very small.

“The hotel was a clean, slightly older facility with a few upgrades to the restrooms. Rooms are very small (barely big enough for the bed and TV. The wifi worked! Continental breakfast was a no go. Great hotel for a quick stop or rugged road warrior.”

Sep 19, 2006 by Richard from Florissant, MO
Overall Rating: 2
Cleanliness:[7] • Staff:[5] • Location:[2]

• Not much.
• It was old and extremely small.

“The hotel did not meet our expectations. It was extremely small, old and run down.”

Aug 23, 2006 by Randolph from Kenner, LA
Overall Rating: 8
Cleanliness:[8] • Staff:[8] • Location:[8]

• Hot, free breakfast every morning was a surprise.
• Twice, housekeeping left window and curtains open for a full view of our stuff in the room.

“Easy access to everything, food, bus, activities. Friendly staff and a comfortable stay. Clear, cold AC. TV aokay. Oversized desk chair in the way. Bath door hard to shut. Closet door blocked by bed hard to use.”

Aug 17, 2006 by Cinella from Donna, TX
Overall Rating: 8
Cleanliness:[9] • Staff:[4] • Location:[6]

• The quality of the room was great.
• We did not like the employees. They were rude and unhelpful.

“I would recommend this hotel to friends and family. The outside does not look pleasing, but the inside decor is fantastic. You can easily relax if you're taking a trip to the Grand Canyon or one of the near by national parks. Also close to a variety of eateries within walking distance.”

Nov 14, 2005 by Marcos from Wellington, FL
Overall Rating: 9
Cleanliness:[9] • Staff:[10] • Location:[9]

• Room had minifridge and microwave. Wi fi . Breakfast was excellent.
• It is a little too noisy at night.

“The hotel doesn't look great, but I left congratulating the front desk attendant for the service, hospitality, breakfast. Showers were great, breakfast better than most higher rated hotels.”

Oct 13, 2005 by Gary from Yuma, AZ
Overall Rating: 9
Cleanliness:[8] • Staff:[8] • Location:[9]

• Centrally located.
• Had to pay extra $15 per night for two beds when I was expecting two beds included.

“Relatively clean for the quality of the hotel, satisfied an overnight stay.”

Aug 25, 2005 by Deborah from Chicago, IL
Overall Rating: 8
Cleanliness:[8] • Staff:[10] • Location:[8]

• The friendly staff and the convenient location

“For my particular itinerary, this motel was conveniently located and clean to suit my needs. I would not hesitate to recomend this motel to someone who would take a similar vacation.”

Jul 1, 2005 by Bruce from Prairie Village, KS
Overall Rating: 10
Cleanliness:[10] • Staff:[10] • Location:[10]

• friendly staff and large bathroom
• neighbor kids cut through the back of the property right outside the bathroom window at street level

“Enjoyed the experience. Would stay there again.”

Jun 21, 2005 by Joan from Sierra Vista, AZ
Overall Rating: 1
Cleanliness:[2] • Staff:[1] • Location:[3]

• This place was the lowest rated hotel I have ever stayed in.
• Price was extremely high, it was unclean and slummy

“There are so many reasons I would never stay there again. The price was outrageous, as they charged us an extra fee for having two beds in the room on top of the base price per night. They were very dirty in appearance and to take a shower, we wore shower shoes. Their "hot breakfast" consisted of powdered eggs in a bowl, and frozen waffles to put in a toaster. Our free HBO didn't work, and no effort was made to fix it. This is a terrible place.”

May 17, 2005 by Teresa V. from Mesa, AZ
Overall Rating: 2
Cleanliness:[2] • Staff:[1] • Location:[1]

• The room had 3 beds- no room to move around any of them
• SMALL room- set up terrible... the Shower was very small and the NO space. The bed was only 5 inches from the Dresser the TV sat on!!!

“I will never stay at any Park side inns anywhere!!!!!!! I am too afraid!!”

Apr 4, 2005 by Kay C. from Laurel, DE
Overall Rating: 1
Cleanliness:[1] • Staff:[1] • Location:[1]

• nothing
• Amatrak train runs every 40min. blowing the horn on arrival and departure.

“The room was inadequate. Paint and new carpet would do wonders. The desk clerk charged us 25.00 extra per room when we arrived, said it was there policy. ”

Mar 24, 2005 by Nicholas from Corsicana, TX
Overall Rating: 1
Staff:[8] • Location:[1]

• Nothing
• the price, the facilities

“This was by far the worst hotel I had ever stayed in. It reminded me of one of those hotels where shady deals go down and people live there because they can't afford an apartment or home. In comparisson, the Hotel in San Francisco was $2 cheaper, 1 1/2 stars higher, in a safer location, had more services, and made this place look like a public restroom at a truck stop or public park. I would never stay in that place again. I would have much rather prefered to keep driving a couple of 100 more miles and stayed somewhere else. ”

• View All User Reviews